Abstract

The European Urological Association (EAU) guidelines suggest penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) only as a third line therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). We looked at the current indications for PPI in clinical practice using data from a prospective national registry. Data from a national multi-institutional database of PPI including patients treated in 2014-2017 in Italy (INSIST-ED) were analysed. Data have been prospectively recorded by 45 surgeons on a dedicated website (www.registro.andrologiaitaliana.it) and revised by a single datamanager. According to EAU guidelines, the indication for PPI was considered appropriate when patients have been offered both a first line (e.g. PDE5is and/or vacuum therapy) and a second line (e.g. intracavernous injection) treatment approach before surgical treatment. Patients with penile curvature and ED were considered as properly submitted to PPI when they were previously offered at least with PDE5is. Logistic regression analyses tested the association between clinical characteristics, surgeon experience and ED etiology with the likelihood of a proper indication for PPI.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.