Abstract

This chapter discusses some major legal concepts, premises, and major liability rules related to tort law and the doctrine of proximate cause. A tort is a civil, seldom a criminal, wrong. When such a wrong occurs, usually one party unintentionally destroys another party's initial entitlement by imposing a negative externality on him. Then, the courts can provide a remedy in the form of damages. Tort law has a price-system rationale. Individual tortfeasors may meet their tort duties for a price, for an appropriate compensation. Therefore, if enterprises unintentionally injure individuals, they are not prohibited from operating; they need only pay compensation for the breach of their tort duty. The tort of negligence is probably the most commonly known tort. It involves a failure to exercise the care of an ordinary prudent and careful person. The question of actual negligence is almost always factual, requiring a jury determination. A key issue in determining liability relates to the defendant's conduct: Has it been such that under the same or similar circumstances a reasonable man would not have caused the resulting injury? Thus, would the conduct of a reasonable man have avoided the ensuing harm? One essential element of negligence is the demonstration of a duty. It relates to a person's responsibility not to destroy another person's initial entitlement. The defendant who owes no duty to the plaintiff cannot be negligent.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call