Abstract

This chapter presents a simulation analysis based on the negative income tax (NIT) versus the credit income tax (CIT) of the economic efficiency and distributional effects of alternative program structures. The essential difference between the NIT and CIT prototypes is in the structure of their marginal tax rates. The simulated NIT imposes higher marginal tax rates on transfer recipients than on those who pay positive taxes, while the simulated CIT does not distinguish between net taxpayers and transfer recipients in its tax rate structure. Both the NIT- and the CIT-simulated plans would substantially redistribute income by increasing taxes paid by those with relatively high incomes and transfers received by those with relatively low incomes. However, neither the simulated NITs nor the simulated CITs would affect economic efficiency, at least as measured by such indicators as aggregate hours of work, deadweight loss, and total earnings. The choices among alternative tax-transfer systems—between NITs and CITs —probably must mainly depend on less objective factors than economic efficiency.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.