Abstract
The literature records many examples of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) exhibiting aberrant immunohistochemical profiles. These can lead to diagnostic difficulty. The objectives of the current study were (1) to examine the immunohistochemical profile of different subsets of MCC to determine whether predictable subset-specific patterns exist and (2) to establish whether shared immunophenotypic patterns might reveal links between individual subsets, as demonstrated previously at a genetic level. In 52 cases of MCC, stratified by viral status and morphology, we studied 5 markers commonly used in the diagnostic evaluation of these tumors (CK20, CK7, chromogranin, neurofilament and TTF-1). Expression of these proteins was recorded as quantitative (H-scores) and absolute (positive vs negative) variables. In general, our data indicate that the “classical” or expected panel (CK20+, NF+, Chromo+, TTF-1, CK7-) is observed significantly more often in pure Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV)–positive than in MCPyV-negative cases (78% vs 25%; P = .002). Neurofilament was less frequently encountered in MCPyV-negative than in MCPyV-positive tumors (66.7% vs 100%; P = .001) and expression of TTF-1 (37.5% vs 3.6%; P = .003) and CK7 (45.8 vs 14.3; P = .02) was more frequent. No significant immonophenotypic differences were observed between pure and combined MCPyV-negative tumors. Recognition of the more aberrant immunohistochemical profile of MCPyV-negative MCC should inform the diagnostic approach to this tumor. Moreover, the shared aberrant immunophenotype in pure and combined MCPyV-negative tumors supports a link between these entities and serves to separate them from MCPyV-positive tumors.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have