Abstract

Abstract Aim To ascertain the risks of undergoing a transperineal biopsy. To investigate the relationship between assessment tools and biopsy result. Method 100 consecutive patients who received a transperineal biopsy between January and June 2021 in Lister Hospital completed a questionnaire. Their investigation results were recorded, and data analysed. Results Complication rates revealed 10% sustained heavy bleeding, 2% went into urinary retention, and 2% were treated with antibiotics for suspected urinary tract infection. Erectile dysfunction was not included on the questionnaire, however 4% raised this as a concern. Average number of cores appeared to be higher in those with complications compared to the whole sample. Pain score generally decreased with age, over 75s averaged 3.9/10 whilst under 65s averaged as 5.4/10. High PSA density and high PIRADS scores are well correlated with risk of positive biopsy PIRADS 2 was an exception to this trend, showing 14% had Gleason >6 compared with 9% in PIRADS 3. Not all PIRADS 2 patients will routinely receive a biopsy and therefore this could be down to preselection bias. All Gleason >6 cases in PIRADS 2 and PIRADS 3 had PSA density >0.15. Conclusions Overall complication rate is low with no readmissions. The procedure is tolerated reasonably well and 85% would be willing to have the procedure again. Possible correlation between number of cores and complications. High PSA density and high PIRADS scores are well correlated with risk of positive biopsy. PIRADS 3 with low PSA density have a low proportion of positive biopsy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call