Abstract

Abstract Aim Clinical governance states that blood results should be flagged during ward rounds to enable better assessment of inpatients. As per our institutional Protocol, each patient is assigned a blood sheet which should be updated every day with outstanding bloods flagged with a circle. The aim of the audit was to evaluate the quality of blood result sheets and to discuss results in order to enhance patient care. Method Data was collected from the Urology ward at Glasgow Royal Infirmary continuously during November 2020. We reviewed the flagging of abnormal bloods and whether clear documentation of baseline eGFR was included. Intervention was carried out by series of discussion with the nursing and the medical staff along with display posters throughout the ward and staff rooms. Results Overall, first cycle assessed 65 folders and second assessed 79. We noticed that the flagging of outstanding blood results increased from 70% to 74%. Documentation of baseline eGFR raised from 32% to 44%. Initially, only 73% of results were appropriately placed in the correct patient nursing folder which improved and reached 100% on review. Conclusions The first cycle of the audit demonstrated serious breach of protocols which could delay and affect patient care. The re-audit cycle post intervention illustrated that active efforts on the part of medical and nursing staff can significantly improve the outcomes. However, sustained intervention in the form of audits and induction program is needed to bring a sustainable change in the departmental practice.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call