Abstract
Aeromedical navigation to the scene of an accident using navigational assistance computer mapping software (NACM) can be difficult in rural areas due to the lack of topographic landmarks. In these instances, navigation is made easier using the Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) system to determine latitude and longitude.Purpose: To determine the reliability and feasibility of portable GPS receivers compared with our current system of NACM (MAP EXPERT®) in the navigation of aeromedical transport flights.Design: A non-randomized prospective trial comparing flights using either GPS or NACM. Setting: Flight program at a Level I trauma center.Methods: GPS receivers (for transmitting location) were carried by half the helicopters and ground EMS units. The NACM system was used to transmit the location of the accident to the other flights. Data on flight time, distance, and accident location were collected. Pilots and EMS personnel using the portable GPS system completed a questionnaire regarding accuracy, reliability, and ease of use.Results: This study included 51 flights; GPS (n = 26) and NACM (n = 25). There was no difference in the miles flown per minute in the NACM group (1.69 miles/minute) compared with the GPS group (1.70 miles/minute). Pilots and EMS personnel rated the GPS reliable, accurate, and easy to use for navigation.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
