#5657 FRAILTY AND VASCULAR ACCESS IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims Frailty is a geriatric syndrome characterized by increased vulnerability to stressors. The elderly become vulnerable and susceptible to adverse outcomes for their health and to functional restrictions. Previous guidelines suggested fistula creation as first choice for vascular access. Current guidelines suggest a more tailored approach to the patient's needs. Despite the high prevalence of frailty in hemodialysis patients, there is paucity of work investigating the relationship between frailty and vascular access failure. The aim of the study was the estimation of frailty with different scores and relationship with the choice of first vascular access, the current vascular access and vascular failures. Method 67 patients in hemodialysis participated to the study (observational cross-sectional study). Frailty was assessed with 6 different scores,Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Frailty Phenotype (FP), Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS), Groningen Frailty Index GFI), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Prisma-7 and ankle-brachial index (ABI) and hand grip were also estimated. The current vascular access, the first vascular access, the vascular access failures and the mean duration of the vascular accesses were also recorded. Finally, the levels of the hemoglobin, serum albumin, C reactive protein, cholesterol were measured for all patients and the hemodialysis adequacy (URR, sp Kt/V) was calculated from the levels of urea before and after the hemodialysis session. Finally, the levels of the hemoglobin, albumin, C reactive protein, cholesterol were measured for all patients and the hemodialysis adequacy was calculated from the levels of urea before and after the hemodialysis session. Results The first vascular access of hemodialysis presents statistically significant relation between frail and robust patients that start hemodialysis with central venus catheter and AVF-AVG respectively. (SPPB- tunneled CVC 85, 7%, non tunneled CVC 46,2% ρ=0,032, Prisma-7- frail tunneled CVC 100%, non tunneled CVC 76,9% ρ=0,018, Groningen FI -frail tunneled CVC 100%, non tunneled CVC 65,7% ρ=0,011, Εdmonton FS -AVF-AVG not frail 64,7%, vulnerable 20,6% ρ=0,042) (Table 1-4). ABI presented a statistically significant relationship with the current vascular access. 68,18% of the patients with normal ABI have AVF-AVG and 60,87% of patients with abnormal ABI have tunneled CVC (p=0,022). In addition, the number of vascular accesses per patient, the mean duration of the accesses and the premature failures (3 months after creation) don't present statistically significant relation with frailty. Conclusion The frailty score could be used as a tool for the choice of vascular access in hemodialysis patients. Further studies, in a larger number of patients, are required to define a reliable and easy to use frailty tool, which is best suited to dialysis access selection.