509. DOES SARCOPENIA AFFECT THE OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH ESOPHAGEAL CARCINOMA AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY?

Abstract

Abstract Background Sarcopenia is increasingly recognized as an independent predictor of clinical outcomes of cancer patients such as post-operative complications and prolonged hospital stays. Additionally, sarcopenia can also negatively impact overall survival because of reduced ability to tolerate treatments like neoadjuvant therapy and surgery. At particular risk among cancer patients is the esophageal cancer population because of tumor stenosis leading to dysphagia and impossibility of oral feeding in many patients. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the effect of preoperative sarcopenia on postoperative complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Methods This retrospective study includes all patients who underwent full-robotic abdominothoracic esophageal resection because of esophageal cancer at our institution between 06/2020 and 12/2022. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) was assessed using the preoperative computed tomographic staging scans by measuring the cross-sectional muscle area at the third lumbar vertebral level. Following cut off SMI values were used to define sarcopenia: men: 52,4 cm2/m2, women: 38,5 cm2/m2 according to Prado et al (Lancet Oncol, 2008). Recorded parameters included demographic data, neo-adjuvant treatment, histologic findings, postoperative course and overall- and disease-free survival. Results A total of 113 cases were included in this preliminary analysis. 97 patients (86%) were classified as having sarcopenia. Of these, 38 patients (40%) had a preoperatively or during esophageal resection implemented percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ) tube to ensure enteral nutrition. Despite age, groups were comparable regarding neoadjuvant treatment and histologic findings (mean age sarcopenic patients: 66y vs. 61y non-sarcopenic patients, p = 0.03). There was no difference in the incidence of occurrence of anastomotic leakage, pulmonary complications, need for re-operation, length of (ICU) stay and overall- and disease-free survival between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients. Conclusion Incidence of sarcopenia is very high among esophageal cancer patients. In our study population, however, preoperative sarcopenia failed to predict complications or long-term outcome after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. 40% of the sarcopenic patients received a PEJ. This relatively high proportion of implemented PEJ could have contributed to the observed comparable outcomes between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients. This observation underlines the importance of prehabilitation and nutritional support for patients with preoperative sarcopenia.