Abstract

BackgroundAfatinib is a 2nd generation EGFR-TKI and has been a standard first line treatment for patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutations. Afatinib has good efficiency, whereas afatinib has severe adverse events (AEs) and often lead to discontinuation of treatment or a dose reduction. NJLCG1601 was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose afatinib maintenance treatment. MethodsEGFR-TKI-naïve stage III / IV / recurrent NSCLC pts harboring EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R or minor mutation) were enrolled. Pts received afatinib 40mg orally once a day. When prescribed AEs (grade ≧ 2 in CACAE ver 4.0) or unacceptable AEs occurred, a dose of afatinib was reduced from 40mg to 30mg, 30mg to 20mg. The treatment was continued until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable severe AEs, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was 1-year progression free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary endpoints were PFS, overall response rate (ORR), the incidence of AEs, and the incidence of grade ≧ 3 AEs. Assuming a threshold 1-year PFS rate of 42% and an expected 1-year PFS rate of 63%, a total of 26 pts was required to have 90% power at a two-tailed alpha of 0.05. This is a subset analysis of patients with adenocarcinoma in NJLCG1601 study (Trial Identifier, UMIN000020688). ResultsBetween Apr 2016 and Sep 2017, 30 pts were enrolled. Among 30 patients, 28 patients (93%) were adenocarcinoma. Pts characteristics were as follows: median ages, 70 years (range 46-79 years); proportion of males, 43%; clinical stage, IV 61% and post-op 39%; EGFR mutation types, exon 19 deletion 54%, ex21 L858R 36%, and minor mutations 11%. 1-year PFS rate was 53.6% (95% CI, 33.8-69.8), median PFS was 13.0 months, and ORR was 78.6%. Dose reductions occurred in 86% (24/28). Incidence of all cause grade ≧ 3 was 60% which is smaller than the frequency of Japanese subset in LUX-Lung 3. ILD was occurred in 3 patients and 1 patients died. Treatment-related deaths were observed in 2 pts. ConclusionsLow-dose afatinib maintenance treatment reduced treatment-related adverse events without detracting from the therapeutic efficacy. Legal entity responsible for the studyUMIN000020688. FundingHas not received any funding. DisclosureA. Nakamura: Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): Chugai; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca. S. Inoue: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): Otsuka Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self), research funding: Kyorin Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Ono Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): GlaxoSmithKline; Honoraria (self): Daiichi Sankyo Company; Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Chugai Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Teijin Pharma; Honoraria (self), research funding: Novartis Pharma; Honoraria (self): Pfizer Inc; Honoraria (self): Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self): Meiji Seika Pharma. S. Sugawara: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Chugai Pharma; Honoraria (self): Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Kyowa Hakko Kirin; Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self): Ono Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): MSD. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.