Abstract
Introduction: ECG-gated vs high-pitch non-ECG-gated CT angiography (CTA) for trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) planning has been controversially discussed, with current recommendations of ECG-gated CTA. However, the impact on clinical outcome, including post-interventional paravalvular leakage (PVL), remains unclear. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare a retrospectively ECG-gated CTA against a high-pitch non-ECG-gated CTA protocol for TAVR planning and their associated impact on clinical outcome.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
