Abstract

G A A b st ra ct s mortality during admission and 3 months follow-up. Secondary endpoints included other morbidity and total costs at 6 months follow-up. RESULTS: Infected necrosis was present in 81 patients (92%). The primary endpoint occurred in 31 of 45 patients (69%) assigned to open necrosectomy and in 17 of 43 patients (40%) assigned to the step-up approach (risk ratio 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 0.87; P=0.006). In the step-up approach group, 35% of patients were successfully treated with percutaneous drainage only and did not require necrosectomy. New onset multiple organ failure occurred less often in the stepup approach group (12% versus 40%; P=0.002). At 6 months follow-up, patients in the step-up approach group had a lower rate of incisional hernias (7% versus 24%; P=0.03), use of pancreatic enzymes (7% versus 33%; P=0.002) and new onset diabetes (16% versus 38%; P=0.02). Mean total costs per patient were $15,963 (12%) lower in the step-up approach group. CONCLUSIONS: A minimally invasive step-up approach, as compared to open necrosectomy, reduced the rate of the composite endpoint of major morbidity and mortality as well as long-term morbidity and costs in patients with (suspected) infected necrotizing pancreatitis. In these patients, percutaneous drainage should be considered as the first step of treatment.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call