Abstract

Abstract Aim This study addresses surveillance cystoscopy in patients diagnosed with bladder and upper tract cancer. Managed Clinical Network (MCN) guidelines have clear recommendations for the timetable of follow-up cystoscopy, and we conducted this audit to study regional compliance. Method Using a multisite pathology database of bladder cancer cases from 2016, we collected and analysed data on 100 non-muscle invasive bladder cancers. We took the first 10 cases from each month to ensure cross-regional representation. Each case was stratified according to MCN guidelines. Electronic medical records were examined to assess upper tract follow up. We allowed for +/- 1 month each side of the target timeframe. Results We had 64 male and 36 female subjects. In our risk categories, we had 31 low risk, 37 intermediate risk and 32 high risk bladder cancers. 67 were new cases, 33 were recurrent tumours. 10 (43.4%) of low-risk and 19 (79.2%) of intermediate-risk patients underwent surveillance cystoscopy earlier than the recommended 12-month timeframe. 18 (78.3%) of low-risk patients continued to have further surveillance cystoscopies after a 12-month disease-free period. Conclusions 43.4% of low-risk bladder cancer patients are receiving surveillance cystoscopy earlier than recommended. 78.3% of these patients are then undergoing unnecessary procedures following a 12-month disease-free period against regional guidelines and recommendations. This places an increased burden on clinic/theatre time and contributes to patient anxiety surrounding cancer follow-up. Evidence-based medicine guidelines have shown that less is more when it comes to low-grade bladder cancer surveillance. We now need to assess why we are deviating from our own guidelines.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call