Abstract
Introduction and aim: Two main mechanical methods of cervical ripening are used: insertion of an osmotic dilators or a balloon catheter. Many trials compared mechanical methods to pharmacological. The effects of different balloons have also been evaluated within last years. One trial compared single balloon vs hygroscopic dilators and another one vs Dilapan-S. No trials compared Dilapan-S dilators vs double balloon catheter.We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Dilapan-S and double balloon cervical catheters for ripening of the cervix in induction of labour.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
