Abstract
Background was signicantly (p=0.01) lower in patients with ARBs (0.12 ±0.20 m.s -1 .y -1 ) compared to those with no RAS medication (0.21 ±0.22 m.s -1 .y -1 ). After adjustment for propensity score, ARBs was signicantly (p=0.001) associated with slower� AS progression, compared to other groups. On multivariable regression model including age, male gender, diabetes, baseline peak aortic jet velocity, valvulo-arterial impedance and propensity score, treatment with ARBs (p=0.005) but notwith ACEIs (p=0.72), was an independent predictor of lower AS progression. Conclusion: This study suggests that ARBs but not ACEIs delayAS progression. These results could be explained by the fact that ARBs provide more complete blockade ofinammatory andbro-calcic processes contributing toAS progression. Thesendings open new avenues for the pharmacological treatment of AS and provide impetus for the elaboration of randomized studies focusing on ARBs in this population.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.