442 A Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes in Robotic and Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy

Abstract

Abstract Aim Technical limitations of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) may translate to high conversion postoperative complications rates. Robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) can potentially allow for better visualisation and greater freedom of movement, improving surgical outcomes. The aim of this retrospective observational study is to compare short term outcomes between RDP and LDP. Method We retrospectively analysed all RDP and LDP procedures performed at our centre by a single surgeon between December 2009 and July 2021. We recorded demographic data for 62 consecutive LDP cases and 27 RDP cases and compared the perioperative outcomes, 90-day morbidity and mortality. Results Both groups were comparable with respect to baseline characteristics. The conversion to open rate was significantly higher in the laparoscopic group (21.0% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.04). Operative time (176.5 min RDP vs. 156.8 min LDP, p = 0.503) and number of operations with clinically significant estimated blood loss (> 500ml) (1 RDP vs. 3 LDP, p = 0.998) was comparable in both groups. For the benign conditions, the spleen preservation rate showed no significant difference between the two groups (14.8 vs. 11.3%, p = 0.729). In both groups, three patients were readmitted within 90 days. There was no 90-day mortality in either group. Conclusions According to our results, RDP was equivalent to LDP in nearly all short-term operative outcomes and safety but significantly reduced the risk of conversion to open resection. However, the evidence is limited, and larger multi-centre randomised trials are needed to investigate the long-term outcomes.