432 SACUBITRIL/VALSARTAN AND RISK OF SUPRAVENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIAS AS DETECTED BY REMOTE MONITORING IN HEART FAILURE PATIENTS

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Abstract Introduction Sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI) has demonstrated a significant benefit compared to angiotensin inhibitor (enalapril) in decreasing both morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). While. recent studies demonstrated that in HFrEF patients, ARNI decreased ventricular arrhythmias no data is available with regards to the supraventricular arrhythmic burden in HFrEF patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronisation therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) and remote monitoring. The aim of out study was to assess if ARNI therapy was able to significantly reduce supraventricular arrhythmias. More specifically the primary endpoint was the incidence of AT/AF episodes, as detected by the device. Secondary endpoints included the total burden of AT/AF, the mean number of premature ventricular contractions (PVC) per hour and the percentage of biventricular pacing per day (in patients with CRT-D). Methods We conducted a multicentre, observational, prospective registry : the SAVE THE RHYTHM (SAacubitril Valsartan rEal-world registry evaluating THE arRHYTHMia burden in HFrEF patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator). We enrolled all patients with HFrEF, ICD or CRT-D actively followed through remote monitoring and starting treatment with sacubitril/valsartan. All patients were followed-up for at least one year. Results At the end of enrollment, 265 patients from 5 centres had at least one sacubitril/valsartan prescription (88% males, age 68±10 years). The annual incidence of AT/AF episodes decreased from 16.6% before sacubitril/valsartan to 12.8%, 6.7% and 0.7% according to the maximum tolerated dose (24/26 mg, 49/51 mg and 97/103 mg, respectively; p=0.026). After treatment with sacubitril/valsartan, patients with at least one episode of AT/AF decreased from 32.6% to 26.5% (24/26 mg), 24.3% (49/51 mg) and 6.9% (97/103 mg); p=.041. A significant decrease in the number of PVC (-28 per hour) and in the rate of appropriate shock (-0.8% per year) were seen in patients with a previous diagnosis of paroxysmal or persistent AF. Patients with permanent AF (n=7) experienced no benefits from sacubitril/valsartan therapy in terms of arrhythmic burden reduction. Patients with a CRT device (41%) experienced a significant increase in biventricular pacing time (+3% per day). Discussion Therapy with sacubitril/valsartan could decrease arrhythmic burden in patients with non-permanent AF and HFrEF and reduce subclinical supraventricular arrhythmias in patients with no history of AF.