Abstract

Abstract Esophagitis as a cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a difficult entity to treat and is associated with significant morbidity. Epidemiologic studies note a 7-18% incidence of significant hemorrhage due to esophagitis. Current existing treatment options for UGIB complicated by hemorrhagic shock secondary to severe esophagitis are limited when there is a lack of response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medical therapy. Methods We present a case series of two patients who developed hemorrhagic shock from esophagitis, underwent endoscopic evaluation revealing limited treatment options, and ultimately required balloon tamponade resulting in successful resolution of bleeding and improvement in hemodynamics. A 55-year-old male with history of alcoholism complicated chronic pancreatitis and esophagitis presented with seizures. On admission he experienced hemorrhagic nasogastric tube output, anemia unresponsive to transfusions and hemodynamic instability. A 44-year-old patient with decompensated alcoholic cirrhosis was initially admitted for renal failure, and during the hospitalization developed melena and hemorrhagic shock requiring transfusions and vasopressors. The patients were promptly started on PPI infusion. Results Both patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealing severe bleeding esophagitis extending from the gastroesophageal junction to the proximal esophagus and no varices. Active bleeding was not amenable to endoscopic therapy and both patients underwent balloon tamponade placement. The first patient required inflation of both the esophageal and gastric balloons for control of hemorrhage for 6 hours whereas the second patient required just gastric balloon inflation for 12 hours. Bleeding, transfusion requirement, and hemodynamics improved in both patients. Second look endoscopy demonstrated resolution of bleeding and hemostatic spray was applied to the esophagus prophylactically. Neither patient had recurrence of bleeding during the hospitalization. Conclusion UGIB secondary to esophagitis is difficult to control due to the highly vascularized nature of the esophagus. Endoscopic therapies are limited in extensive mucosal injury and risks of complications such as perforation are high. Other therapeutic options such as angiography are restricted due to vascular collateralization and surgical interventions have high morbidity and mortality. Balloon tamponade provides a viable treatment option for severe UGIB secondary to esophagitis that is not responsive to medical therapy.

Highlights

  • After peptic ulcer disease and erosive gastritis and duodenitis, esophagitis is the most common cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), and its incidence is increasing [1]

  • We report a case series of patients with hemorrhagic shock secondary to esophagitis who required balloon tamponade for hemostasis

  • Review began 06/23/2021 Review ended 08/10/2021 Published 08/14/2021. This case report was accepted as an abstract in the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus annual meeting, which was scheduled for August 19-21, 2020 in Toronto, Canada, but was postponed due to the coronavirus pandemic

Read more

Summary

Introduction

After peptic ulcer disease and erosive gastritis and duodenitis, esophagitis is the most common cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), and its incidence is increasing [1]. We report a case series of patients with hemorrhagic shock secondary to esophagitis who required balloon tamponade for hemostasis. This case report was accepted as an abstract in the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus annual meeting, which was scheduled for August 19-21, 2020 in Toronto, Canada, but was postponed due to the coronavirus pandemic. A 44-year-old male with decompensated alcoholic cirrhosis, pulmonary hypertension, and mixed connective tissue disease was admitted with renal failure and pneumonia He developed hematemesis and melena with an acute decrease in hemoglobin from 7.6 gm/dL to 3.9 gm/dL, thrombocytopenia to 25 thous/uL, coagulopathy with INR 2.0, and shock. B: Case 2 post-balloon tamponade endoscopy demonstrating resolution of bleeding

Discussion
Conclusions
Findings
Disclosures
15. Greenwald B
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.