43 Evaluating the Relationship Between Social Support, Executive Function, and Communicative Effectiveness

Abstract

Objective:Research suggests greater perceived social support is associated with better general cognitive function in community-dwelling older adults. While these findings expand our understanding of the role of social support in healthy aging, further work is needed to investigate the role of social support in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Of particular interest is the relationship between executive function (EF), communicative effectiveness, and social support, as these are common areas of decline and are likely to impact one’s ability to meaningfully interact with others. The present study aimed to evaluate the association between perceived social support, EF, and communicative effectiveness. We hypothesize better EF performance and communicative effectiveness would be associated with higher levels of perceived social support in older adults with MCI.Participants and Methods:One hundred and twenty-one older adults with MCI were included in the current study. All participants were enrolled in Charles and Harriett Schaffer Cognitive Empowerment Program (CEP) at Emory University, a comprehensive lifestyle program for individuals diagnosed with MCI and their care partners. Upon CEP enrollment, participants completed self-report questionnaires, including the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), the Communicative Effectiveness Index (CETI), and EF assessments including Letter Fluency (phonemic fluency), Digit Span Backward (working memory), and the Test of Practical Judgment (decision making). Additionally, a subset of participants completed the written Trail Making Test - Part B (set-shifting; n = 63). Pearson bivariate correlations were utilized to explore the relationship between MSPSS, CETI, and EF performance.Results:Higher levels of perceived social support were significantly associated with communicative effectiveness (r = .210, p = .021), such that participants who endorsed having more social support also reported greater confidence in their communicative effectiveness. Perceived social support was associated with better working memory performance (r = .342, p < .001), phonemic fluency output (r = .261, p = .041), and shorter time to complete TMT-B (r = -.244, p = .052), indicating individuals with higher perceived social support demonstrated better EF abilities. Finally, greater confidence in communicative effectiveness was associated with better performances in working memory (r = .274; p = .008), phonemic fluency output (r = .213; p = .020) and decision making (r =.192; p = .044), suggesting stronger working memory, phonemic fluency, and practical decision-making abilities support better communicative effectiveness. There was no association between social support and practical decision-making abilities (r = .146, p = .129).Conclusions:The current findings demonstrate a link between higher levels of social support, communicative effectiveness, and EF abilities, particularly in the subdomains of working memory, phonemic fluency, and set-shifting. This link suggests individuals with stronger EF abilities may have greater communicative effectiveness and, in turn, may be better able to maintain social relationships and garner social support. Future research is needed to evaluate the causality in this relationship, as it remains possible those with stronger social support networks maintain communicative effectiveness and EF for longer. Thus, further evaluation of the mechanism(s) underlying the relationships between social support, EF, and communicative effectiveness is needed.