415 Virtual Reality Simulator use in Orthopaedic Training: What do the Trainees Think?

Abstract

Abstract Aim To gather the opinions of orthopaedic trainees on the use of virtual reality (VR) simulators in their training. Method Twelve entry level orthopaedic trainees trialled a tibial nailing surgery on a VR simulator. Each participant completed a pre- and post-intervention questionnaire containing twelve 10-point Likert scale questions assessing their opinions on VR simulator use in their training. Paired data sets were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results Only 25% of participants had previously experienced a VR simulator, yet participants felt strongly that VR simulators had a place in orthopaedic training (M = 8.750 ± 1.288) and that if they had access, they would use a VR simulator to practice surgical skills (M = 9.000 ± 1.044). After trying the VR simulator, participants felt more strongly that VR simulators should be a mandatory part of orthopaedic training (M = 6.750 ± 1.658 to M = 7.500 ± 1.567, P = 0.048); VR simulators are an engaging learning tool (M = 8.583 ± 1.379 to M = 9.417 ± 0.793, P = 0.029); access to a VR simulator would improve their training (M = 8.250 ± 1.545 to M = 9.250 ± 0.866, P = 0.036) and VR simulators will form the basis of orthopaedic training in the future (M = 5.250 ± 2.734 to M = 6.667 ± 2.498, P = 0.032). Conclusions Orthopaedic trainees want VR simulators in their training and will use them if given access. A positive reception from trainees is vital in order to effectively implement VR simulators into orthopaedic training.