(401) Treatment Utilization and Temporal Trends in Peyronie’s Disease: A Retrospective Analysis of an Insurance Claims Database

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The current treatment algorithm for Peyronie’s Disease (PD) was updated in 2015 to exclude oral therapies. Non-surgical pharmacological management is now limited to intralesional therapy with Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCh), Interferon, or Verapamil. Surgical options include tunical plication, plaque incision/excision with or without grafting, and penile prosthesis surgery with or without adjunctive procedures. An understanding of trends in management of PD since the updated guidelines is limited. Objective Our objective is to assess treatment utilization and temporal trends in PD with the change in guidelines. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of men with PD using data in the IBM MarketScan insurance claims database. Patients were identified using ICD 9/10 codes and treatments were identified using J and CPT codes. Only patients aged ≥18 years with at least 1 year before and after a PD diagnosis were included in the analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to describe non-surgical and surgical treatment groups. Linear regressions were also performed to assess the trends of each year based on initial PD treatment. Results Between 2011-2019, we identified a total of 45,114 patients with a diagnosis of PD. Overall, while the majority (91.9%) chose conservative management with no intervention, 1,041 (2.3%) pursued intralesional therapy and 2,594 (5.8%) pursued surgical intervention as an initial treatment option. Among the patients who initially opted for intralesional therapy, 67 (6.4%) sought subsequent surgical treatment whereas 974 (93.6%) did not pursue additional treatment. In comparison, 116 (4.5%) patients who initially underwent surgical intervention sought subsequent treatment with the remaining 2,478 (95.5%) not pursuing additional treatment. Annual overall treatment rates increased from 7.2% to 8.1%. There was a statistically significant increase in the utilization of intralesional therapies from 0.3% in 2011 to 4.1% in 2019 (p=0). Surgical interventions significantly declined from 6.8% to 3.9% over the same time period (p=0.004). Conclusions The present study demonstrates that PD treatment trends have changed over time. With overall low secondary treatment rates for patients initially pursuing either non-surgical or surgical treatment options, a greater proportion of patients are initially pursuing less invasive, non-surgical treatment options with intralesional therapy over time. These findings emphasize the dynamic nature of treatment decisions and contribute to a deeper understanding of the treatment landscape that can be incorporated into patient counseling. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Paterna bio, Firmtech, Turtle health, Maximus, Carrot, Contraline, endo pharmaceuticals, inherent biosciences, techfields inc, macro trials, alto neurosciences, curebase, vivify medical.