Abstract
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SR/MA) on the prevention and treatment of child and adolescent mental disorders are increasingly available. When conducted using rigorous methodological standards, these knowledge syntheses provide a gold-standard information source that can guide healthcare decision making and inform priorities for future research. Because little attention has been given to documenting and improving their methodological rigor, we applied SR methods to evaluate the quality of SR/MA on the prevention or treatment of child and adolescent anxiety, depression, and suicide.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
