Abstract
AbstractThis paper discusses connection principles for methods and tools, between traditional Requirement Engineering and Problem Domain Analysis, in order to be able to manage every kind of requirement: functional, non functional, knowledge and rule based. This paper is based on studies carried out at NCS‐FRANCE, part of the Naval Combat Systems Group (NCS) of Thomson‐CSF.Thomson‐CSF has set up a common policy for System Engineering at the corporate level, which includes a method called MIST (“MŽthode d'IngŽnierie Systme Thomson‐CSF”), based on Draft MIL‐STD‐499B standard, and a tool which is RDD‐100TM. The additional work performed at Thomson‐CSF/NCS focuses on the analysis of operational requirements in the area of C3I systems. A Problem Domain Analysis approach appears to provide a promising solution. The method used by Thomson‐CSF/NCS in this area is KADS (Knowledge Analysis and Design Support), which is a conceptual modeling language stemming from European research projects. The tool which implements this method is OpenKADSTM.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.