Abstract

High-field-strength intraoperative MR imaging has emerged as a powerful adjunct for resection of brain tumors. However, its exact role has not been firmly established. We sought to determine the impact of 3T-intraoperative MRI on the surgical management of childhood CNS tumors. We evaluated patient data from a single academic children's hospital during a consecutive 24-month period after installation of a 3T-intraoperative MRI. Tumor location, histology, surgical approach, operating room time, presence and volume of residual tumor, need for tumor and non-tumor-related reoperation, and anesthesia- and MR imaging-related complications were evaluated. Comparison with pre-intraoperative MRI controls was performed. One hundred ninety-four patients underwent intraoperative MRI-guided surgery. Of these, 168 were 18 years or younger (mean, 8.9 ± 5.0 years; 108 males/60 females). There were 65 posterior fossa tumors. The most common tumors were pilocytic astrocytoma (n = 31, 19%), low-grade glioma (n = 31, 19%), and medulloblastoma (n = 20, 12%). An average of 1.2 scanning sessions was performed per patient (maximum, 3). There were no MR imaging-related safety issues. Additional tumor was resected after scanning in 21% of patients. Among patients with a preoperative goal of gross total resection, 93% achieved this goal. The 30-day reoperation rate was <1% (n = 1), and no patient required additional postoperative MR imaging during the same hospital stay. Intraoperative MRI is safe and increases the likelihood of gross total resection, albeit with increased operating room time, and reduces the need for early reoperation or repeat sedation for postoperative scans in children with brain tumors.

Highlights

  • BACKGROUND AND PURPOSEHigh-field-strength intraoperative MR imaging has emerged as a powerful adjunct for resection of brain tumors

  • Comparison was made with a cohort of pediatric patients with brain tumor at our institution from before installation of the Intraoperative MR imaging (iMRI) scanner

  • We evaluated 3T-iMRI patient data for a consecutive 24-month period (February 2011 to February 2013) from a single academic children’s hospital, identifying patients 18 years or younger who underwent iMRI-guided resection

Read more

Summary

Methods

We evaluated patient data from a single academic children’s hospital during a consecutive 24-month period after installation of a 3T-intraoperative MRI. Histology, surgical approach, operating room time, presence and volume of residual tumor, need for tumor and non-tumor-related reoperation, and anesthesia- and MR imaging–related complications were evaluated. Comparison with pre-intraoperative MRI controls was performed. This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act– compliant retrospective study was performed after institutional review board approval. We evaluated 3T-iMRI patient data for a consecutive 24-month period (February 2011 to February 2013) from a single academic children’s hospital, identifying patients 18 years or younger who underwent iMRI-guided resection. Intraoperative parameters evaluated included operating room entry time, time of initial skin incision and skin closure, operating room exit time, patient position, surgical approach, estimated blood loss, and anesthesia-related complications. We determined whether frameless stereotactic navigation was used and whether this was performed by using scans obtained in the operating room or before arrival in the operating room

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call