3M syndrome: Evaluating the clinical and laboratory features and the response of the growth hormone treatment: Single center experience

Abstract

Introduction & objective3 M Syndrome is a rarely encountered autosomal recessive syndrome characterized by low birth weight, severe postnatal growth deficiency, and minor dysmorphic abnormalities. 3 M-related short stature has been attributed to the resistance to growth hormone (GH) to a certain extent rather than to GH deficiency. The resistance to GH, on the other hand, has been associated with impaired protein scaffolding, transport, and p53-mediated apoptosis at the IGF-1 post-receptor pathway. In this context, the objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical, laboratory, and genetic characteristics of the patients with 3 M syndrome, detect the mutations frequently observed in these patients, and assess their response to GH treatment. Material&methodsThe sample of this single-center study consisted of patients diagnosed with 3 M syndrome based on genetic tests between 2007 and 2021. Patients’ clinic, laboratory, and genetic characteristics pertaining to the time of admission and follow-up were recorded. All patients except one underwent a growth hormone stimulation test (GHST) (Levo-dopa or insulin tolerance test). Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) generation test was performed on those with sufficient GHST results (0.1 mg/kg/day for four days). ResultsThe median age of the patients, five females and three males, was 2.8 (0.25–8.12) years at admission. All but one patient were small for gestational age (SGA). The patient with normal birth weight was the baby of a diabetic mother. Obscurin-like 1 (OBSL1) variant was detected in all cases. The median height standard deviation score (SDS) at admission was −4.94 ((-5.63)- (−3.27)) SDS, and the median midparenteral height SDS was −1.27 SDS ((-3.1)- (0.34)). All patients were prepubertal at admission. The GHST response was sufficient in five cases. IGF generation test was performed in three cases. Seven patients received GH therapy (35–57 μg/kg/day). Five of these patients discontinued GH therapy since their growth velocity (GV) fell below normal during treatment. In addition, one case discontinued GH therapy because her IGF-1 value was>2 SDS, and another case received gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs together with GH therapy. The median age and height SDS of the patients were 10.1 (1.79–18) years and −5.09 SDS ((-7.11)- (2.45)), respectively, as of the last follow-up visit. The height SDS values of the two cases that reached the final height were −7.11 SDS and −3.39 SDS. There were no side effects of GH treatment. ConclusionThe study findings indicated a good GV during the early stages of the long-term GH treatment administered to patients with 3 M syndrome. However, response to GH therapy decreased in the following years, and the desired improvement in height SDS could not be achieved in patients who reached their final heights. Taken together with the literature data, it has been concluded that initiating GH therapy in the prepubertal period provided better outcomes than after puberty.