Abstract
Total kidney volume, measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is a validated disease progression marker in adults with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). However, in childhood, MRI is burdensome, explaining the need for alternatives. Kidney volume (KV) was evaluated in 30 children with ADPKD, using three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS), applying the ellipsoid method and manual contouring (KV3DUS-ellipsoid, KV3DUS-contour respectively); manual contouring on MRI (KVMRI), and the ellipsoid method on two-dimensional ultrasound (2DUS, KV2DUS). Correlations and differences were evaluated using Pearson's r and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and variability using Bland-Altman plots. All ultrasound volumetry methods showed significantly lower mean (± SD) KV (mL), compared with MRI-KV2DUS: 159 (±101); K3DUS-ellipsoid: 169 (±105); KV3DUS-contour: 185 (±110); KVMRI: 206 (±130); all p < 0.001. All had a strong correlation with KVMRI: 2DUS: r = 0.96; 3DUS-ellipsoid: r = 0.89 and 3DUS-contour: r = 0.94. Both before and after correction factor application, Bland-Altman plots showed lower variability and absolute error for KV3DUS-contour vs KV2DUS and KV3DUS-ellipsoid. Compared with MRI, ultrasound volumetry was prone to underestimation. However, KV3DUS-contour represents a valuable alternative for MRI in early ADPKD. Although more time-consuming, KV3DUS-contour is recommended over KV2DUS for estimation and follow-up of KV in ADPKD children, given its smaller error.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.