Abstract

This study presents and discusses the possibility of using 3D printed polymer tools to achieve a flexible metal forming production line. An example is given of the design of a sheet metal part from tool printing to the actual forming and evaluation of the achieved precision of the formed part. The time spent by the engineer/operator during the full process cycle is documented and compared to the time it would take to make the corresponding tool by conventional metal machining. The time savings revealed in the paper are relevant for a low number of parts to be formed in a flexible manufacturing environment, while it is less relevant in mass production where metal forming is conventionally an attractive process. Besides the time invested by the engineer/operator, it is also important to keep the costs of the tools at a minimum in flexible manufacturing. Therefore, the paper also presents a comparison of the costs for printed tools as compared to conventional tools made from metal machining. This analysis considers the cost of raw materials, machine time and electricity consumption. The environmental aspects of metal forming are also considered, with the lubricating oils and greases typically used to improve frictional conditions being replaced by the polymers, which themselves have anti-friction properties. Finally, the recyclability of the tools is significant when they are only used to form a few parts. Different types of polymers and printing strategies are discussed in relation to recyclability and compared to the alternative metal tools.

Highlights

  • 9th CIRP Global Web Conference – Sustainable, resilient, and agile manufacturing and service operations: 9th CIRP Global Web Conference – SusLtaeisnsaobnlse,frreosmiliCenOt,VaInDd-1ag9ile manufacturing and service operations: Lessons from COVID-19

  • The Filament Deposition Modeling (FDM) printing technology distinguishes itself from the others for being an almost zero material waste process due to the precise control of the extruded material

  • While sheet metal forming is traditionally reserved for mass production, the considerations presented in this work is aimed at showing the possibility of making sheet metal forming into a flexible process

Read more

Summary

Tool costs

The following cost analysis considers different factors, such as the cost of raw materials, machine time and electricity consumption. The FDM printing technology distinguishes itself from the others for being an almost zero material waste process due to the precise control of the extruded material This is not the case for the conventional subtractive manufacturing methods. The 3D printer used in the present work (Ultimaker 2+) cost 1700 euros, which means that starting out it will be more expensive than producing a single set of tools by wire EDM. For a future flexible manufacturing unit, it should be mentioned that the newer version of the 3D printer (Ultimaker 2+ Connect) can be operated through a Wi-Fi or Ethernet connection This allows printing to be commenced from anywhere within a company’s network but comes at a higher price; namely 2182 euros [15]. Steel tools are still better suited for sheet metal forming processes that are characterized by high production volume due to their resistance against wear and the tool cost being distributed over many formed parts

Outlook
Findings
Recyclability and polymer choice
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call