Abstract
Abstract Whereas 3D printing of thermoplastics is highly advanced and can readily create complex geometries, 3D printing of metals is still challenging and limited. The origin of this asymmetry in technological maturity is the continuous softening of thermoplastics with temperature into a readily formable state, which is absent in conventional metals. Unlike conventional metals, bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) demonstrate a supercooled liquid region and continuous softening upon heating, analogous to thermoplastics. Here we demonstrate that, in extension of this analogy, BMGs are also amenable to extrusion-based 3D printing through fused filament fabrication (FFF). When utilizing the BMGs’ supercooled liquid behavior, 3D printing can be realized under similar conditions to those in thermoplastics. Fully dense and amorphous BMG parts are 3D printed in ambient environmental conditions resulting in high-strength metal parts. Due to the similarity between FFF of thermoplastics and BMGs, this method may leverage the technology infrastructure built by the thermoplastic FFF community to rapidly realize and proliferate accessible and practical printing of metals.
Highlights
The materials toolbox has traditionally demanded hard choices [1]
Zr44Ti11Cu10Ni10Be25 was selected as a model system to study metallic glass material extrusion because it is widely characterized, commercially available, and has high thermoplastic formability [28,29,30]
Amorphous Zr44Ti11Cu10Ni10Be25 rods with 1 mm diameter and up to 70 cm length were used as printing media
Summary
While the structural performance of metals is superior to that of thermoplastics, processing of metals is generally challenging (Fig. 1). Plastics, thermoplastics, can be readily processed into complex geometries, but exhibit inferior structural performance [1]. A contemporary example is additive manufacturing (AM), which, for thermoplastics, has enabled 3D printing of complex shapes through a material extrusion process, called fused filament fabrication (FFF). The versatility and practicality for AM of metals lags significantly behind [2]. This is essentially due to the inability to maintain metals at viscosities on practical time scales that would be suited for processing/forming operations such as material extrusion in FFF processes (Fig. 1)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.