Abstract

3D printing of polymeric foams by direct-ink-write is a recent technological breakthrough that enables the creation of versatile compressible solids with programmable microstructure, customizable shapes, and tunable mechanical response including negative elastic modulus. However, in many applications the success of these 3D printed materials as a viable replacement for traditional stochastic foams critically depends on their mechanical performance and micro-architectural stability while deployed under long-term mechanical strain. To predict the long-term performance of the two types of foams we employed multi-year-long accelerated aging studies under compressive strain followed by a time-temperature-superposition analysis using a minimum-arc-length-based algorithm. The resulting master curves predict superior long-term performance of the 3D printed foam in terms of two different metrics, i.e., compression set and load retention. To gain deeper understanding, we imaged the microstructure of both foams using X-ray computed tomography, and performed finite-element analysis of the mechanical response within these microstructures. This indicates a wider stress variation in the stochastic foam with points of more extreme local stress as compared to the 3D printed material, which might explain the latter’s improved long-term stability and mechanical performance.

Highlights

  • Elastomers: (a) an open-cell stochastic foam; and (b) an additively manufactured (AM) foam with the facecentered-tetragonal (FCT) lattice structure, the diameter of each cylindrical strut being 250 μ m

  • We report multi-year accelerated aging experiments on a stochastic PDMS foam and compare with a 12-month-long aging study on an AM FCT foam of comparable porosity

  • While additive manufacturing continues to open up exciting materials design and application possibilities across diverse disciplines, there is a crucial need to address the long-term stability and performance of the AM parts and devices

Read more

Summary

Rubber used for stochastic foam

The direct ink write foam clearly exhibits uniform pore size and spacing whereas the stochastic foam contains a distribution of pore sizes with several in close contact This clustering and overlapping of pores produces thin walls and highly concave topologies resulting in local stress concentrations indicated by the yellow and red regions in the figure. Consistent with its uniform architecture, the AM FCT foam exhibits highly repeatable and more uniform stress contours in both filament orientations with magnitudes less than a factor of two below the maximum stress in the stochastic foam

Discussion and Summary
Author Contributions
Findings
Additional Information
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call