Abstract

Object recognition tasks are widely used assays for studying learning and memory in rodents. Object recognition typically involves familiarizing mice with a set of objects and then presenting a novel object or displacing an object to a novel location or context. Learning and memory are inferred by a relative increase in time investigating the novel/displaced object. These tasks are in widespread use, but there are many inconsistencies in the way they are conducted across labs. Two major contributors to this are the lack of consistency in the method of measuring object investigation and the lack of standardization of the objects that are used. Current video-based automated algorithms can often be unreliable whereas manual scoring of object investigation is time consuming, tedious, and more subjective. To resolve these issues, we sought to design and implement 3D-printed objects that can be standardized across labs and use capacitive sensing to measure object investigation. Using a 3D printer, conductive filament, and low-cost off-the-shelf components, we demonstrate that employing 3D-printed capacitive touch objects is a reliable and precise way to perform object recognition tasks. Ultimately, this approach will lead to increased standardization and consistency across labs, which will greatly improve basic and translational research into learning and memory mechanisms.

Highlights

  • Object recognition tasks are widely used assays for studying learning and memory in rodents (Ennaceur, 2010; Antunes and Biala, 2012; Heyser and Chemero, 2012; Lueptow, 2017)

  • To test the validity of the CapTouch 1.0 system, videos from the object preference task, the familiarization phase of the 10-min delay novel object recognition task, and the test phase of the 10-min delay novel object recognition task were compared with manual scoring

  • Using the sum of object investigation across each session we found a high degree of correlation between manual scoring and the capacitive touch sensing (Pearson correlation, R2 = 0.9216, p, 0.0001; Fig. 2H)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Object recognition tasks are widely used assays for studying learning and memory in rodents (Ennaceur, 2010; Antunes and Biala, 2012; Heyser and Chemero, 2012; Lueptow, 2017). Intact learning and memory are inferred based on increased investigation of the modified object(s) during the test phase, i.e., we infer that the animal recognizes the object as novel and thereby directs greater investigative behavior toward it (Heyser and Chemero, 2012; Leger et al, 2013; Lueptow, 2017). These tasks are in widespread use, but there are many inconsistencies in the way they are conducted. Examples of objects used during object recognition tasks include plastic toys, glass

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.