Abstract

This paper reviews the past and current trends of three-dimensional (3D) modeling and reconstruction of plants and trees. These topics have been studied in multiple research fields, including computer vision, graphics, plant phenotyping, and forestry. This paper, therefore, provides a cross-cutting review. Representations of plant shape and structure are first summarized, where every method for plant modeling and reconstruction is based on a shape/structure representation. The methods were then categorized into 1) creating non-existent plants (modeling) and 2) creating models from real-world plants (reconstruction). This paper also discusses the limitations of current methods and possible future directions.

Highlights

  • The structure of plant shoots is an important cue for plant phenotyping and cultivation

  • Appli‐ cations for plant science, breeding, and cultivation have been actively developed in the plant phenotyping (PP) field, while technical components of 3D modeling have been primarily related to the computer vision (CV) field

  • This paper summarized past and current trends in plant modeling and reconstruction methods, which are catego‐ rized into 1) creation of virtual plants and trees and 2) model‐ ing from real-world plants and trees

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The structure of plant shoots (i.e., leaves and stems) is an important cue for plant phenotyping and cultivation. There have been tree/plant modeling methods other than the recursive/self-organizing processes One of these meth‐ ods sets up tree structures to connect the randomly distrib‐ uted points by graph optimization and manual interaction, Okura resulting in trees with irregular appearance representing some environmental effects (Xu and Mould 2012). A recent method directly infers L-systems from line drawings (Guo et al 2020a), which shows a potential of using deep learn‐ ing for the estimation of structural representations Inverse procedural modeling Another possibility of user-guided plant modeling is to provide richer cues (than sketches or silhouettes) to the modeling system, namely, to provide photographs of plants/ trees or an existing 3D model (e.g., polygon meshes or a point cloud) to infer plant/tree structures. 3D laser scanners and the LiDAR approach measure the traveling distance of emitted light via phase differences, which output 3D shapes with an absolute

Method
Conclusions and future directions
Literature Cited
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.