Abstract
The design of several electromagnetic devices, such as magnets and transformers, leads to a 3D magnetostatic field analysis. Although such problems can be solved by using vector potential formulations, scalar potential techniques seem to be more efficient because of the reduced number of unknowns they introduce. Even these methods, however, present certain drawbacks, depending on the way the scalar potential is defined: considerable cancellation errors in iron parts, difficulties to simulate multiply connected iron cores, a complicated way to compute a source field distribution.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: COMPEL - The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
