Abstract
AbstractWe present the results of a 3D fault-seal analysis across the central part of the Jasmine Field, Gulf of Thailand. Two techniques were applied; a stochastic juxtaposition analysis across thin, stacked, laterally variable reservoirs and then a comparison of fluid contacts and reservoir capillary pressure against predicted fault clay content. The two methodologies can be compared to better understand how they provide insights into reservoir behaviour. Our objective was to estimate capillary threshold pressures for fault-seal calibration in exploration prospects in the Gulf of Thailand. First, the stochastic juxtaposition analysis workflow evaluated whether known oil/water contact (OWC) levels in the key reservoir intervals could be explained by crossfault juxtaposition patterns. Second, modeling was used to calibrate fault capillary threshold pressure against predicted fault clay content. Fault clay content is estimated from the shale gouge ratio (SGR) and compared to the reservoir capillary pressure estimated from known OWC levels and fluid densities for each reservoir interval. The maximum capillary threshold pressure for a given clay content can be estimated and calibrated to trend curves for fault seal across the basin. For 12 key reservoir zones examined, stochastic juxtaposition analysis cannot explain observed OWC levels by crossfault juxtaposition for all reservoir intervals. Therefore, control by structural spillpoints and/or capillary membrane sealing across faults is required. Estimated capillary pressure information is combined with measured mercury-air capillary threshold pressure from Jasmine A reservoir samples and published data to create clay content-capillary threshold pressure curves to estimate fault-sealing capacity across the Jasmine Field. The results can be applied to other fields and prospects in the Gulf of Thailand. Fault-seal analysis and estimation of fault properties in areas with multiple stacked, laterally variable reservoirs is notoriously problematic because of the large uncertainties involved. Our approach of stochastic juxtaposition analysis combined with capillary pressure modeling allows the uncertainties to be addressed while providing concise and usable input to decision-making.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.