Abstract

Aim. This study aspires to assess the role of 3D-Endoanal Ultrasound (3D-EAUS) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in preoperative evaluation of the primary tract and internal opening of perianal fistulas, of secondary extensions and abscess. Methods. During 2014, 51 Crohn's disease patients suspected for perianal fistula were enrolled. All patients underwent physical examination with both the methods and subsequent surgery. Results. In the evaluation of CD perianal fistulas, there are no significant differences between 3D-EAUS and MRI in the identification of abscess and secondary extension. Considering the location, 3D-EAUS was more accurate than MRI in the detection of intersphincteric fistulas (p value = 10−6); conversely, MRI was more accurate than 3D-EAUS in the detection of suprasphincteric fistulas (p value = 0.0327) and extrasphincteric fistulas (p value = 4 ⊕ 10−6); there was no significant difference between MRI and 3D-EAUS in the detection of transsphincteric fistulas. Conclusions. Both 3D-EAUS and MRI have a crucial role in the evaluation and detection of CD perianal fistulas. 3D-EAUS was preferable to MRI in the detection of intersphincteric fistulas; conversely, in the evaluation of suprasphincteric and extrasphincteric fistulas the MRI was preferable to 3D-EAUS.

Highlights

  • Perianal fistula is a chronic inflammatory condition defined as an abnormal perianal tract that connects two epithelial surfaces, usually the anal canal and the perianal skin [1]

  • Considering the location, 3D-Endoanal Ultrasound (3D-EAUS) was more accurate than Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the detection of intersphincteric fistulas (p value = 10−6); MRI was more accurate than 3D-EAUS in the detection of suprasphincteric fistulas (p value = 0.0327) and extrasphincteric fistulas (p value = 4 ⊕ 10−6); there was no significant difference between MRI and 3D-EAUS in the detection of transsphincteric fistulas

  • Both 3D-EAUS and MRI have a crucial role in the evaluation and detection of Crohn’s disease (CD) perianal fistulas. 3D-EAUS was preferable to MRI in the detection of intersphincteric fistulas; in the evaluation of suprasphincteric and extrasphincteric fistulas the MRI was preferable to 3D-EAUS

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Perianal fistula is a chronic inflammatory condition defined as an abnormal perianal tract that connects two epithelial surfaces, usually the anal canal and the perianal skin [1]. This condition is often highly recurrent and may require repeated surgical treatments [2, 3]. Aim of this study is to assess the role of 3DEndoanal Ultrasound (3D-EAUS) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in diagnosing primary tract, and secondary extension, in localizing internal opening of perianal fistulas and identifying the relation between the anal fistula and anal sphincters

Methods
Results
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call