Abstract

The aim of this study was to validate geometric accuracy and in vivo reproducibility of landmark-based cephalometric measurements using high-resolution 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at 3 Tesla. For accuracy validation, 96 angular and 96 linear measurements were taken on a phantom in 3 different positions. In vivo MRI scans were performed on 3 volunteers in five head positions. For each in vivo scan, 27 landmarks were determined from which 19 angles and 26 distances were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using Bland-Altman analysis, the two one-sided tests procedure and repeated measures one-way analysis of variance. In comparison to ground truth, all MRI-based phantom measurements showed statistical equivalence (p < 0.001) and an excellent agreement in Bland-Altman analysis (bias ranges: −0.090–0.044°, −0.220–0.241 mm). In vivo cephalometric analysis was highly reproducible among the five different head positions in all study participants, without statistical differences for all angles and distances (p > 0.05). Ranges between maximum and minimum in vivo values were consistently smaller than 2° and 2 mm, respectively (average ranges: 0.88°/0.87 mm). In conclusion, this study demonstrates that accurate and reproducible 3D cephalometric analysis can be performed without exposure to ionizing radiation using MRI.

Highlights

  • The aim of this study was to validate geometric accuracy and in vivo reproducibility of landmark-based cephalometric measurements using high-resolution 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at 3 Tesla

  • We demonstrated that accurate and precise 3D cephalometric analysis is feasible using non-ionizing, high-resolution MRI

  • Our findings indicate that 3D cephalometric analysis could be performed using MRI in the future

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The aim of this study was to validate geometric accuracy and in vivo reproducibility of landmark-based cephalometric measurements using high-resolution 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at 3 Tesla. Radiation exposure caused by CBCT is substantially higher compared to conventional radiographs[11] and indications are restricted to severe clinical cases[10] This constraint results in limited evidence for diagnostic efficacy of 3D cephalometric analysis so far[8,10]. We developed a time-efficient, high-resolution MRI technique and a dedicated software tool Using this methodology, the purpose of the present study was to validate geometric accuracy and reproducibility of MRI in landmark-based 3D cephalometric analysis in two consecutive steps: First, the accuracy of angular and linear measurements was analyzed in vitro by scanning a cuboid phantom in different positions and comparing results to ground truth. The reproducibility of 3D cephalometric measurements in various head positions was evaluated in vivo

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call