3D C-arm navigated suture button implantation for AC joint dislocations - the pilot study.

Abstract

The surgical treatment of acute traumatic AC joint dislocations is still a subject of scientific debate in the literature. The arthroscopically assisted stabilization procedure with a suture button system has been successfully established and is widely used in daily practice. It is minimally invasive and allows the anatomical reconstruction of the torn coracoclavicular ligaments in one step with a permanent implant that does not have to be removed in a second operation. This clinical pilot study is the first to describe the new method of navigated suture button implantation with the future aim of further reducing surgical invasiveness and further increasing surgical precision. 10 patients with a Rockwood 3b/5 injury could be included in the prospective study (DRKS00031855) within 5 months according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Surgical stabilization was performed with a suture button system via a navigated coracoclavicular drill tunnel. Demographic and radiological data as well as information on health and shoulder function were collected from patient records, X-rays, DVT scan and 3 questionnaires (DASH, NHS and Eq.5D) at the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative (discharge, 6 weeks and 3 months) time points. All operations could be performed within 8.8 days (± 6.81) after trauma. The average operation time was 50.3min (± 8.81). The mean distance of the drill hole in the clavicle to the AC joint was 26.6mm (± 2.63). The radiologically measured vertical coracoclavicular distance was 38.8mm (± 6.16) at discharge and 41.11mm (± 7.51) at 3 months. This loss of reduction was not statistically significant. In contrast, the DASH, NHS and Eq.5D results showed significant improvement from discharge to 3 months postoperatively. Image-guided 3D C-arm navigated AC joint suture button stabilization is feasible in everyday surgical practice. It may be possible to achieve a further reduction in invasiveness while at the same time increasing the accuracy of implant positioning. Further clinical studies with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up period are necessary to enable a comparison with conventional methods.