395 Diagnostic role of native T1 mapping compared to conventional magnetic resonance techniques in cardiac diseases: a real-life study

Abstract

Abstract Aims T1 mapping is a validated technique in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), however in real-life clinical practice its effectiveness to diagnose myocardial disease is still unclear. To compare native T1 mapping to conventional late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and T2-STIR techniques for the evaluation of a cohort of consecutive patients undergoing CMR for the suspicion of myocardial disease. Methods and results CMR was performed in 323 patients, 206 males (64%), mean age 54 ± 8 years, and in 27 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. LGE, T2-STIR, and pre- and post-contrast T1 mapping were acquired as suggested by the SCMR position paper. The CMR findings of global and regional T1 mapping were compared to the respective results of LGE and T2-STIR techniques. The main baseline indications for CMR were: suspicion of ARVC in 20%; non-ischaemic DCM in 19%; HCM in 16%; chest pain without obstructive coronary artery in 14% of patients (suspicion of MINOCA, Tako-tsubo or myocarditis); other indications (amyloidosis, scleroderma, previous myocardial infarction, pericarditis, LV non-compaction) in the remaining of cases. At T2-STIR images myocardial hyperintensity suggesting oedema was found in 41 patients (27%). LGE images were positive in 206 patients (64%). Native T1 mapping was abnormal in 171 (49%). In 206 patients (64%) a matching between LGE and native T1 was found (both positive in 132 and negative in 74). T1 was also abnormal in 32 out of 41 (78%) with oedema at T2-STIR. Overall, LGE and/or T2-STIR were abnormal in 209 patients, whereas native T1 in 154(52%). Conventional techniques and T1 mapping were concordant in 208 patients (64%). Conventional techniques were abnormal in 76 (24%) of patients with negative T1 mapping. Finally, in 39 patients T1 mapping was positive despite negative conventional techniques (12%). Among these latter 39 patients, only in 18 T2-STIR were acquired based on clinical decision. Then, the percentage of cases where T1 mapping could have an additive role would range between 6% and 12%. T1 mapping was particularly able in conditions with diffuse myocardial damage as cardiac amyloidosis, scleroderma and fabry disease (additive role in 42%). On contrast, T1 mapping was less effective in cardiac disease with regional distribution of myocardial damage as myocardial infarction, HCM, myocarditis (additive role in 1%). Conclusions T1 mapping may give additive information in 6–12% of patient but is less effective cardiac disease presenting with regional or segmental distribution of myocardial damage. Results of the present study suggest that conventional LGE/T2-STIR and T1 mapping are complementary techniques and should be used together in every CMR examination.