Abstract

Abstract Aim This review aims to investigate the procedure itself, post-operative complication rates and long-term outcomes of both VATS procedures and thoracotomy procedures in the treatment of VRs. Method A literature search of the MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases were performed at the projects inception to present. From the 361 articles retrieved, 271 were excluded. After applying the exclusion criteria and thorough manual screening, 14 studies were included in the review. 6 of these studies investigated the outcomes using thoracotomy, 3 case reports plus 2 studies that investigated the outcomes using VATS and 3 studies that directly compared the two procedures. All 11 studies were retrospectively performed with 4 studies collecting data for over 20 years, 2 studies over 10 years and the remaining studies collected data for 2–8 years. Results Overall, 590 cases in this review focused on using thoracotomy operations and 190 cases used VATS. The main themes from the results of the literature included: type of vascular ring identified, case and collection period of the studies, the surgical approach, post-operative complications, length of stay in hospital, symptom resolution, reoperation rates and mortality. In this review, VATS demonstrated reduced length of stay in hospital, lower reoperation rates and a lower mortality rate than the thoracotomy studies. The results indicated similar rates in operating time and rates of post-operative complications between the two procedures. Conclusions This review provides insight into the encouraging outcomes in the use of VATS compared to the thoracotomy cases which is the gold standard approach in vascular ring surgery.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.