Abstract

Previous studies reported the activation of the apoptotic cascade by vitrification in mature porcine oocytes (Vallorani et al. 2012 Anim. Reprod. Sci. 135, 68-74) and that the cathepsin B inhibitor E-64 improved developmental competence of bovine oocytes via an antiapoptotic effect (Balboula et al. 2013 Reproduction 146, 407-417). The present study was carried out to test whether E-64 affected the developmental competency of porcine oocytes vitrified at the germinal vesicle stage. Cumulus-enclosed porcine oocytes were vitrified in microdrops and warmed by our method (Somfai et al. 2015 J. Reprod. Dev. 61, 571-579). Then, the oocytes were subjected to in vitro maturation (IVM) for 46h in a chemically defined porcine oocyte medium supplemented with 10ng mL−1 of epidermal growth factor, 10IU mL−1 of eCG, and 10IU mL−1 of hCG and during the first 22h of IVM with 1mM dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate. Then, cumulus-oocyte complexes were fertilized in vitro and presumptive zygotes were cultured in 50-µL drops of porcine zygote medium-3 for 7 days in 6-well dishes covered by paraffin oil in an atmosphere of 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2 at 39°C. On Day 5 (Day 0=IVF), the porcine zygote medium-3 was supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) FCS. The effects of 1.0μM of E-64 supplementation during IVM of non-vitrified and vitrified cumulus-oocyte complexes were investigated in a 2×2 factorial design. Survival rates after IVM, cleavage rates on Day 2, blastocyst rates, and total cell numbers in blastocysts on Day 7 were compared among groups. The experiment was replicated 5 times. Results were analysed by ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. The percentages of live oocytes were statistically similar when oocytes were matured in the absence or presence of E-64 both in non-vitrified (99.2% v. 99.6%, respectively) and vitrified (94.3% v. 90.8%, respectively) groups. Similarly, IVM without or with E-64 supplementation had no effect on subsequent cleavage and blastocyst development rates in non-vitrified (67.4% v. 71.2% and 38.7% v. 43.2%, respectively) and vitrified (46.8% v. 48.8% and 14.6% v. 22.8%, respectively) oocytes. Irrespective of E-64 treatment, all survival and developmental rates in the vitrified groups were significantly lower (P<0.05) compared with those of their non-vitrified counterparts except for the blastocyst development rate in the E-64-treated vitrified group, which did not differ significantly from those of the non-vitrified groups with or without E-64 treatment. There was no statistical difference in mean blastocyst cell numbers among the groups, ranging between 86.5±15.8 and 118±10.6. In conclusion, E-64 treatment had no effect on embryo production rates, which suggests that in our system, cathepsin-mediated apoptosis during IVM might not be the factor to limit embryo production using either fresh oocytes or those vitrified at the immature stage. This work was supported by JST/JICA SATREPS.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call