Abstract

34th Annual Meeting & Pre-Conference Programs of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC 2019): part 2

Highlights

  • Cancer cells require outside supply of some non-essential amino acids (NEAAs) to survive

  • Deprivation of NEAAs could negatively impact the immune activation, an essential process for immunotherapy, because fast cell proliferation poses a higher demand for building blocks such as NEAAs

  • It is not clear whether dietary NEAA deprivation could be combined with immunotherapy for better safety-efficacy profiles

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cancer cells require outside supply of some non-essential amino acids (NEAAs) to survive. Immune checkpoint inhibition targeting PD-1/PD-L1 has shown promise in breast cancer but is largely limited to triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).[1] This limitation is primarily due to inherently low levels of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), in HR+ disease.[2] Focal radiation therapy (RT) has been shown to generate anti-tumour T cells and increase TILs using mouse models of breast cancer (BC).[3,4] Mechanistically, radiation-induced increase in cytosolic DNA leads to activation of cGAS/STING pathway and production of IFN-훃, which is essential for priming of anti-tumour CD8+ T cells.[5] This process is under the control of TREX1, and dependent on RT dose and fractionation.[5] Inter-tumor variability in optimal RT dose for activating the IFN-I pathway and heterogeneity in immunological response amongst BC subtypes highlight the importance of precision use of RT.[6] We are testing the hypothesis that improved in vitro and in vivo assays allow testing of the pro-immunogenic response to radiation in individual BC patients. In the BALB/c-derived 4T1 mouse model of immunotherapy-refractory metastatic breast cancer, we have previously shown that tumor-targeted radiation therapy (RT) combined with CTLA4 blockade induces CD8+ T cell-mediated regression of irradiated tumors and inhibits lung metastases [2]. We systematically profiled these states across nearly 17,000 solid tumor samples from TCGA, PRECOG [2], in situ transcriptomics arrays, and other publicly available resources, to determined their associations with genomic features, clinical outcomes, and spatial organization

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call