349. TOTALLY MECHANICAL STAPLED SIDE-TO-SIDE VERSUS CIRCULAR END-TO-SIDE ANASTOMOSIS FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE IVOR LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY: A MULTICENTER ANALYSIS

Abstract

Abstract Background Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy (TMIE) is increasingly used in treatment of patients with esophageal cancer. However, it is currently unknown if fully mechanical stapled side-to-side anastomosis for Ivor Lewis TMIE could be preferred for patients in whom both procedures are oncologically feasible. Methods The study was performed in 2 high-volume China esophageal cancer centers between Feb 2015 through Dec 2022. Prospectively collected data from consecutive patients with esophageal cancer localized in the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction undergoing Ivor Lewis TMIE were included. The primary outcome parameter was anastomotic leakage requiring reintervention or reoperation. Secondary outcome parameters were operation characteristics, pathology results, complications, reoperations, length of stay, mortality, and overall survival (OS). Results 147 patients were included in this study. The incidence of anastomotic leakage requiring reintervention or reoperation was 12.9% after fully mechanical stapled side-to-side versus 11.8% after circular end-to-side anastomosis (P = 0.852). Fully mechanical stapled side-to-side Ivor Lewis esophagectomy was significantly associated with a lower incidence of anastomosis stricture (5.7% vs 17.1%, p = 0.032). Pulmonary complications (20.0% vs 23.7%), recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (7.1% vs 5.3%), chyle leakage (10.0 vs 7.9%), atrial fibrillation (12.9 vs 13.2) and median hospital length of stay (12 vs 11 days) were comparable between the two arms (all P > 0.05). R0 resection rate was similar between the groups. Overall survival was comparable between the two arms (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81, 95% CI, 0.62–1.21, P = 0.208). The cumulative 5-year OS was 44.3% in the fully mechanical stapled side-to-side anastomosis arm, as compared with 39.5% in the circular end-to-side anastomosis arm. Conclusion Compared to circular end-to-side anastomosis in patients in whom both procedures are oncologically feasible, there was no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic leakage and other postoperative morbidity and OS with a fully mechanical stapled side-to-side anastomostic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Fully mechanical stapled side-to-side Ivor Lewis esophagectomy was significantly associated with a lower incidence of anastomosis stricture.