Abstract

BackgroundIncreasing our ability to identify youths at risk of psychosis in the general public is a key step towards an improved ability to prevent the disorder. Prospective evaluation of youths with early psychotic-like experiences can enrich our knowledge of clinical, biobehavioral and environmental risk and protective factors associated with the development of psychotic disorders.MethodsBy using a neurodevelopment prospective cohort study we aimed to investigate the predictors of psychosis spectrum features among US youth. This is the first large systematic study to evaluate subclinical symptoms in the community. From a Time 1 screen of 9,498 youth (age 8–21) from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort, a subsample of participants was enrolled based on presence or absence of psychosis spectrum symptoms to participate in an approximately 2-year (n=503, mean age=17) and/or 4-year (n=313; mean age=19) follow-up assessment. Participants were administered the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes, conducted blind to initial screen status, along with the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire and other clinical measures, computerized neurocognitive testing, and neuroimaging. Age normative references scores of baseline psychosis screening measures were applied to inform interpretation of psychosis symptom endorsements. Clinical and demographic predictors of symptom persistence were examined using logistic regression.ResultsAt 4-year follow-up, psychosis spectrum features persisted or worsened in 58% of youths endorsing symptoms at baseline. Among youths assessed at all three time-points (n=197), 54% showed temporal stability in presence or absence of psychosis spectrum symptoms, while the remainder exhibited varying patterns of symptom emergence, remission and re-occurrence over time. Baseline depression and social/occupational dysfunction were significant predictors of the occurrence of psychosis spectrum symptoms at either follow-up. Preliminary data on neurocognition, and brain structure and function, will be also discussed with the ultimate aim of integrating them with clinical data, to provide early indices of symptom persistence and worsening in youths at risk for psychosis.DiscussionTogether, our findings indicate that varying trajectories of psychosis spectrum symptoms are evident early in US youth representative of the general community, supporting the importance of investigating psychosis risk as a dynamic developmental process.

Highlights

  • Concurrent SymposiaS57 with the exception of bipolar mood disorders (similar risk) and brief psychotic episodes (higher risk)

  • General practitioners are usually the first health professionals contacted by people with early signs of psychosis

  • A prognostic risk stratification model based on preselected variables, including index diagnosis, age, sex, age by sex, and race/ethnicity, was developed and externally validated, showing good performance and potential clinical usefulness. This lecture will introduce a new online individualized risk calculator which can be of clinical usefulness for the transdiagnostic prediction of psychosis in secondary mental health care

Read more

Summary

Concurrent Symposia

S57 with the exception of bipolar mood disorders (similar risk) and brief psychotic episodes (higher risk). The ARMS designation accounted only for a small proportion of transitions to psychosis (n = 52 of 1001; 5.19% in the derivation data set), indicating the need for transdiagnostic prediction of psychosis in secondary mental health care. Discussion: This lecture will introduce a new online individualized risk calculator which can be of clinical usefulness for the transdiagnostic prediction of psychosis in secondary mental health care. The risk calculator can help to identify those patients at risk of developing psychosis who require an ARMS assessment and specialized care. The use of this calculator may eventually facilitate the implementation of an individualized provision of preventive focused interventions and improve outcomes of first episode psychosis. Jesus Perez*,1, Huajie Jin, Debra A Russo, Jan Stochl, Michelle Painter, Sarah Byford, Peter Jones1 1University of Cambridge; 2King’s College London; 3Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust

Background
Findings
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call