Abstract

Abstract Benign oesophageal strictures (BES) are often easily treated but around 30% progress into recurrent or refractory benign oesophageal strictures (RBES), that need repetitive dilatations. Difficulties of RBES have been widely discussed in the literature, but there is not a well-established consensus regarding the definition of RBES. In this study we wanted to develop a simple definition in relation to aetiology and number of dilatation sessions per stricture. A retrospective study on 242 BES-patients treated with endoscopic dilatation was performed. The primary endpoint was need of further dilatation per procedure, based on total number of dilatation sessions performed and stricture ethology. Univariate and multivariable regression analysis were performed to assess risk factors for RBES. Among 242 patients, 76 had RBES. The need of further dilatation increases with 13% at fifth dilation session and keeps a continuous mean value at 81%. Investigating some aetiologies separately, the point where need increases does vary. The risk of having RBES decreased for distal (Odds Ratio (OR) 0,25 (Confidence interval (CI) 95% 0,09-0,65)) and middle (OR 0,35 (CI 95% 0,13-0,88)) location of the stricture compared to proximal strictures. We propose that a stricture can be defined as RBES when reaching the fifth dilatation session. At that point we also suggest that clinicians should consider additional treatment, in addition to dilatation, in order to resolve the stricture.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call