Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of NAC (Fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC100) or docetaxel) in predicting pathological complete response in axillary nodes (pCRA) based on changes in SUVmax on PET in the primary tumour in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Methods: Women with node positive LABC were randomized to receive 4 cycles of FEC100 followed by four cycles of docetaxel (Arm A), or the regimen in reverse order (Arm B). FDG-PET studies were performed at baseline, after 4 and 8 cycles of NAC. pCRA to NAC was assessed in surgical specimens. Receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) was performed to determine a cut-off value Δ% SUV 1-2 and SUV 1-3 for prediction of nodal status after NAC. Association between SUVmax changes and pCRA was analysed by Mann Whitney U test. Results: One hundred women with node positive LABC were enrolled into the study, 52 (%) were treated on Arm A and 48 (%) on Arm B. Ninty five (95%) had invasive ductal cancers, 64(%) were ER + , 32(%) were HER2 + , while 23(%) were triple negative subtype. Baseline characteristics and PET SUVmax values were similar in two Arms. Baseline PET SUVmax correlated with tumour grade (P = 0.003), triple negative phenotype (P = 0.014) and Ki67 index (P = 0.005). All women had axillary lymph node dissection with fifty one (51%) undergoing breast conserving surgery. pCRA was seen in 46 (%) women. Overall there was no significant difference in pCRA rates between the two drug regimens. PET SUV reduction after four cycles of FEC was a strong predictor of pCRA. In Arm A, pCRA was associated with median PET SUVmax reduction of 81% after 4 cycles of FEC, in contrast to only 39% reduction after 4 cycles of docetaxel in Arm B (P Conclusions: PET SUV response in the primary tumour, after 4 cycles of FEC100 accurately predicts the axillary status. By contrast assessment of PET response with docetaxel resulted in higher rates of false positive and negative. This methodology may allow for selection of patients for less aggressive axillary surgery after NAC. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.