Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims In Japan, of the >340,000 chronic dialysis patients, approximately 60% have lifestyle-related diseases including diabetes and nephrosclerosis. Two-thirds of maintenance dialysis patients (age, ≥65 years) often develop aortic stenosis (AS) and other serious and complex systemic cardiovascular disease complications associated with chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). Furthermore, renal function loss and a prolonged state of renal failure are observed requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). AS in dialysis patients progresses quickly, and the frequency of hospitalized treatment for heart failure increases with the worsening condition, leading to ADL deterioration, which may subsequently cause dialysis hypotension/interruption. At our hospital, of the 420 maintenance dialysis patients who died during hospitalization in 5 years before 2020 (420/2,637 = 16%), 32 cases (8%) developed AS complications, which became their direct cause of death in 12 cases (3%), and aortic valve replacement (AVR) was performed in 5 cases (1%). Maintenance hemodialysis patients (HD) are at high risk group and have a poor prognosis for life. Previously, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was not indicated., but recently TAVI has been approved in Japan. Efficacy of TAVI for HD patients remains unclear, here we investigated several outcomes. Method A total of 123 maintenance dialysis patients with severe AS were included in 2019–2021. We examined TAVI group and AVR group for length of hospital stay, hospitalization costs, life expectancy, and rates of complications such as occurrence of arrhythmias. Results Over a 3-year period, we performed TAVI for 58 maintenance dialysis patients (mean age, 81 years); their median duration of hospitalization was 14 days for a median cost of 6,259,350 JPY. The mean age was older than that of 66 patients who underwent open-heart AVR during the same period (mean age, 73 years; 35 days for 7,192,570 JPY); therefore, the cost was less, and the rate of complications, including vital prognosis and arrhythmia, was not inferior in hospitalization period. Conclusion In conclusion, TAVI is effective for elderly maintenance dialysis patients with severe AS and has a positive health care economics, ADL maintenance.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call