3286Fractional flow reserve-guided treatment strategy for left main coronary artery stenoses. Ten-year clinical outcome

Abstract

Abstract Background Revascularization decisions regarding left main (LM) coronary stenoses are often very challenging. Non-invasive tests can yield false negative results. On the other hand, some technical aspects of fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement, as well as the interpretation of their results, are less codified than for other coronary segments. Purpose To investigate the 10-year clinical outcome of patients with isolated angiographically intermediate LM coronary stenosis in whom the treatment strategy was based on Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) measurements. Methods From 1999 to 2009 we included 96 patients with isolated intermediate LM coronary disease (DS% 30–70%) evaluated with FFR measurement. When FFR was >0.80, patients were deferred to medical therapy (Deferral-group, n=71). When FFR was ≤0.8, surgical revascularization therapy was proposed (Revascularization-group, n=25). Death, the occurrence of myocardial infarction (MI) and the need for target vessel revascularization (TVR) were evaluated in both groups. Results There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the 2 groups. Mean DS% was 35% in the Deferral-group and 43% in the Revascularization-group (p<0.01). Average FFR was 0.88 in the Deferral-group and 0.71 in the Revascularization-group (p<0.01). In the latter, the 10-year survival estimate was 72% while it was 77% in the Deferral group (HR [95% CI]: 1.28 [0.53–3.10]; p=NS). No difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of MI (4.5% vs. 1.6%; HR [95% CI]: 3.5 [0.22–56.0]; p=NS) or TVR (9% vs. 12%; HR [95% CI]: 0.94 [0.20–4.43]; p=NS). Conclusions The use of FFR to defer revascularization in patients with non-significant isolated LM stenosis is safe and is associated with favourable clinical outcome at 10 years.