Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Historically, the transfemoral approach (TFA) has been the most common access site for cerebral intraoperative angiogram (IOA). However, in line with trends in cardiac interventional vascular access preferences, transradial approach (TRA) and transulnar approach (TUA) are gaining popularity due to favorable safety and patient satisfaction outcomes. METHODS: Between July 2016 and December 2022, 317 angiograms were included based on our case definition, comprising 59 TRA cases, 11 TUA cases, 243 TFA, and four transpopliteal cases. Fluoroscopy time, contrast dose, reference air kerma (RAK), and dose area products (DAP) per target vessel catheterized were the primary endpoints of interest. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to evaluate predictors of elevated contrast dose and radiation exposure metrics. RESULTS: Contrast dose per vessel catheterized was significantly lower in TRA/TUA cases versus TFA cases (p = 0.001), but radiation exposure metrics did not differ between access site groups. TRA/TUA versus TFA does not significantly predict elevated levels of radiation exposure or contrast dose. Aneurysm cases were associated with significantly lower odds of elevated radiation exposure for all radiation metrics (p < 0.05) whereas AVM cases had higher odds of elevated radiation exposure across all measures (p < 0.01). There was a significant relationship between case number and operative indication over the study period (p < 0.001) with a decrease in the proportion of cases for aneurysm treatment offset by increases in total cases for the management of AVF and AVM. CONCLUSIONS: TRA and TUA are safe and effective access site options for neurointerventional procedures and are increasingly employed. Cases using wrist access may be associated with a lower contrast dosing for patients.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call