309 ASSOCIATION BETWEEN CERVICAL ANASTOMOSIS METHODS AND ANASTOMOSIS STRICTURE AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR CANCER

Abstract

Abstract Esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection is the most important part of advanced esophageal cancer therapy, especially for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients. After esophagectomy, cervical anastomosis with gastric tube is required. However, some patients suffer anastomotic stenosis and require endoscopic balloon dilations. In this study, we investigated the relationship between cervical anastomosis methods and anastomosis stricture after esophagectomy for cancer patients. Methods Patients with esophageal cancer undergoing radical esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis were identified from the prospectively maintained database at our institution. From 2013 to 2019, 28 patients received esophagectomy with cervical lymph node dissection in our institution. Association between anastomotic methods, linear stapler vs circular stapler, and other factors (patient characteristics, surgical complications including anastomotic stenosis, and length of postoperative stay) were analyzed. Results Their average age was 63.3 years. Males and SCC cases predominated. Thirteen patients (46%) received cervical anastomosis with the circular stapler (Group C), and 11 patients (39%) received treatment with the linear stapler (Group L). None of the following variables were significant different between the two methods: preoperative chemotherapy (53.8% in group C vs. 45.5% in group L; p = 0.58), length of hospital stay (25.8 vs. 20.7 days; p = 0.15), pulmonary complications (16.7% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.36), and anastomotic leakage (33.3% vs. 9.1%; p = 0.24). However, the rate of anastomotic stenosis without malignancies was significantly higher in group C patients (66.7% vs. 0%, p < 0.01). Conclusion Cervical anastomosis with the linear stapler may be safer and associated with a lower stenosis rate than with the circular stapler. In future, cervical anastomosis with linear stapler after mediastinoscopic esophagectomy would be better for not only esophageal SCC patients but also esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma patients with pulmonary complications.