#3029 Vitamin D-binding protein: a candidate biomarker for CKD progression

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims The toxic effects of filtered proteins on the tubules cause a more rapid progression of disease in individuals with higher levels of proteinuria, suggesting the presence of “high-risk candidate” proteins that could contribute to CKD progression. In our previous cross-sectional proteomic study, vitamin D-binding protein (VTDB) showed a significant association with kidney function. However, its persistent expression as a urinary protein in CKD patients remains unknown. Therefore, our aim was to investigate the persistent expression of VTDB in CKD patients and healthy controls during the follow-up period. Method The urinary proteomics was investigated using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in 18 follow-up CKD patients with stages 1-3 and 15 follow-up healthy individuals. Data analysis was performed by Mascot-SwissProt and STATA software. Parametric and nonparametric statistics were used to analyze results and the relationship between baseline characteristics and proteomic profile. Exponentially Modified Protein Abundance Index (emPAI) was used to estimate peptide count of proteins. Results The participant's baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. The median (IQR) follow-up time for all participants was 368 (250-472) days. A statistically significant difference was found in the initial emPAI of VTDB between the HC and CKD groups. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the follow-up emPAI of VTDB between the two groups. Notably, emPAI values of VTDP decreased over the follow-up period compared to the initial values. Correlation analysis (Table 2) showed that the elevated levels of urinary VTDB emPAI are associated with decreased levels of initial and follow-up eGFR. A higher negative percentage change (a decline in eGFR over time) was also associated with elevated levels of VTDB protein over the follow-up period. Also, urinary VTDP protein has demonstrated a significant positive correlation with 24 h proteinuria. Conclusion In this proteomics study cohort, we observed persistent expression of urinary VTDB protein during the follow-up period in CKD patients compared to healthy controls. Additionally, a statistically significant negative correlation between VTDB protein and eGFR was observed. These findings need further validation using different measurement tools for urinary VTDB assessments and in a larger cohort of CKD patients. Declaration We have no conflict of interest to disclose.