Abstract
Summary A combination of audiomagnetotelluric (AMT) ground and borehole measurements can be expected to reduce the ambiguity in models of electrical resistivity as compared to models computed from ground data. We consider a synthetic 2-D model with a dipping mineralisation zone of ~ 1 Ohmm resistivity and 1.5 km depth extent embedded in a resistive host of 10000 Ohmm underneath weathered overburden of 100 Ohmm. 2-D inversion models derived from combinations of surface impedance measurements and borehole measurements in the form of horizontal magnetic transfer functions and vertical magnetic and electric transfer functions are compared. We observed that combinations of ground and borehole AMT measurements yield inversion models that have better pronounced resistivity contrasts at depth than models computed exclusively from surface measurements. To record the types of borehole AMT data suggested by us, 3-component borehole magnetometers sufficiently sensitive to the AMT magnetic field need to be developed. A miniaturised 3-component SQUID magnetometer may be a promising solution.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.